beta
Text
1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 20,000,000 and KRW 15,00,000 among them.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Defendant is a doctor operating the C Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). The Plaintiff was administered by the Defendant Hospital in the process of surgery for blocking the cromatic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic s
B. The Plaintiff’s symptoms appeal and the Defendant hospital’s treatment process 1) around 2005, the Plaintiff received an operation at the Guro University Hospital, Korea University Hospital. (2) On March 22, 2010, the Plaintiff appealed to the Defendant hospital by using a radioactive source which did not go to the front and the left side as the main lake and marsh, and complaining that there was an urbine and an urbine, and on March 23, 2010, the Plaintiff appealed to the Defendant hospital on March 23, 2010.
Accordingly, on March 23, 2010, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital confirmed that the local matho (ney is connected to the region) was connected to the Plaintiff, and performed a local matho removal operation. At the time of the operation, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital confirmed that there was the Mendo (Teed Nos. syndrome) with the Plaintiff, which is getting up to 2 thousandsnife.
3) On March 29, 2011, the Plaintiff complained of the Defendant’s hospital that she could not sleep because she was so blind, and that she could not sit. Accordingly, the Defendant brought an appeal to the lower court for an appeal after the operation on March 29, 2011. (4) On May 23, 2011, the Defendant carried out the instant treatment (hereinafter “instant treatment”).
While the Plaintiff was discharged from the instant medical procedure, at around 21:00 on the same day, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital while complaining of the difficulty in pain and urbing to the bridge, and the medical professionals of the Defendant Hospital inserted the artificial urbium to the Plaintiff.
5 The plaintiff was hospitalized at the defendant hospital until July 15, 2011, but the situation where the plaintiff was unable to feel her needs continued, was diagnosed with neutronic cycy, and it is impossible to her own urology.