beta
Text
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 83,963,655 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its amount from August 29, 201 to July 12, 2016.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The defendant is a doctor operating the C Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), which is the specialized hospital in spine, and the plaintiff is a person who has undergone the raculation surgery at the Defendant Hospital in the raculation.
B. (1) Around March 5, 2011, the Plaintiff was involved in the instant traffic accident following the Plaintiff’s vehicle driven by the Defendant Hospital (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”).
(2) Due to the instant traffic accident, the Plaintiff complained of the symptoms, such as the radioactive ray, scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic sc
3) On August 26, 2011, the Plaintiff’s continued pain medical examination conducted by the Defendant on the part of the Defendant’s hospital on the part of August 26, 201, by inserting the internal diameter formed through the luxe clibrate, the Plaintiff is conducting a procedure to remove the lux and reduce the size of the disc by inserting the luxe clibrate with a disc clibine, and inserting it into the lux by inserting the inner diameter formed through the luxe clibrate, and then identifying the lux with a disc clibine, or using the rax when necessary.
[4] On August 29, 201, the Plaintiff was admitted to the Defendant Hospital on the recommendation of the Plaintiff, and the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital conducted the raculation surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”) after confirming that the numerical value was normal by conducting blood and blood coacing tests on the Plaintiff.
C. After the procedure, the Plaintiff was measured on August 30, 201, the following day of the instant procedure, on which the heat was 38C, and complained for the pain of the operation department.
The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital on September 1, 201 is against the Plaintiff.