The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is operating the D Hospital located in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

In 2015, the Plaintiff was subject to the removal of conical signboards No. 5 and No. 1 in 2015.

B. On November 21, 2016, the Plaintiff, who was admitted to the Defendant Hospital, had caused approximately two weeks to the right her butt her m, the right her mar, the right her mar, the right her mar, and the physical mar of 3 to 5 her mar.

The appeal was lodged.

On November 21, 2016, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital confirmed that the Plaintiff’s right development and the development power of the Plaintiff was weakened, and confirmed that the RoI test conducted by the Plaintiff that the Round escape certificate between the Plaintiff and the 1st head of the Round pressured on the right pathal.

(c)

On November 23, 2016, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed selective negotition to the Plaintiff, but did not show the Plaintiff’s symptoms. Accordingly, on November 29, 2016, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital decided to conduct the convergence between the post-defluence (hereinafter “first operation”) between the post-defluences and the post-defluences (hereinafter “the first operation”) between the following: No. 5 of the 2016, Nov. 29, 2016.

On November 29, 2016, the Plaintiff was under the first operation from the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital, but the Plaintiff’s opinion on the 11.30 A.M., on November 30, 201, was observed on the right side from the 11.30 A.M. day after the operation.

(d)

On November 30, 2016, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital conducted X-ray shooting and MRI inspection on the Plaintiff’s treatment department, but there was no particular opinion that there was anything much more than that of the blood species in some climatic space.

The medical personnel at Defendant Hospital performed the search for the part of the surgery on the same day and the removal of the blood species (hereinafter “the second surgery”), but thereafter, the Plaintiff’s symptoms did not appear. From December 22, 2016, the Plaintiff complained of symptoms of urology, such as urine urology.

E. Although the Plaintiff discharged on May 2, 2017, the symptoms of sufficient sewage (footop), urology, etc. were not improved. By the end of the pleadings in the instant case, the symptoms of sufficient sewage, urology, and urology on the right side are continuing until the end of the pleadings.