Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 21, 2017, the Defendant damaged property: (a) on the front side of the apartment road of the 45-gil-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si on the ground that the victim B (52 older) was the Defendant; (b) on the ground that the victim took a phone with the Defendant, the victim taken the phone with the Defendant, and

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the mobile phone device that is owned by the victim to be in excess of KRW 204,00.

2. In around 02:55 on January 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) asked questions about the instant circumstances, etc., of the victim F, etc. of the victim F, who was called up after having received the report from the above B-112, the Defendant insulting the victim at the Dong-dong Police Station E-gu, U.S., the Dong-dong Police Station E-gu, U.S., and sent out after having received the report from the above B-B-12 on March 21, 2017; and (b) under the hearing of four persons, such as the above B-B, the Defendant “hicke at the risk of governance; (c) murder at the age of

C. For about twenty (20) minutes, such as taking a bath for C. C. C. E. F. H., the victim openly insultingd the victim for 20 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police officer under B;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of written estimates to repair personal telephones;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The fact that the Defendant had been punished for violent crimes before the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act prior to the order of provisional payment is more than several times, and that it is not good that the crime is not committed against the police officer.

However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the fact that the defendant makes a confession of and reflects his/her mistake, the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim B at the police investigation stage, and the conditions of the sentencing as shown in the records and arguments.