A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine of three hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) dispatched a report to the effect that he interferes with the taxi business in the vicinity of the 14 complex of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, 300, and sent the report to the Defendant; and (b) expressed that “A police officer belonging to the B police station of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, U.S., Seo-gu, U.S., U.S., Do who has the right to return home to the Defendant,” who is called “A police officer of the B police station of the Dong-gu, U.S., Seo-gu, U.S., where he had the right to return home to the Defendant.” The Defendant

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order and the prevention of crimes.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act around 02:00 on December 31, 2016, as described in paragraph (1) of the same Article, committed an assault by a police officer to interfere with the performance of official duties, and was arrested in the act of interference with the performance of official duties, and was transferred to the district located in Seo-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul., “I am the bomb and the same bom in the future.”

I will not find any side of Nao and find any side of it.

C. C. C. C. C. with the large e.g., f., f.b. p.c., irresh for about 30 minutes.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police with respect to C, and police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation report (in the case of video recording on personalphones),

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) (Punishment of imprisonment) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 3 (3) 1 (Punishment of Punishment of Minor Offenses) of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act;

1. Article 37, Article 38 (1) 3, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70 of the Criminal Act, Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order is that the defendant had committed a crime such as interference with the execution of official duties in this case, even though he had been convicted of a number of violent crimes and a fine obstructing the performance of official duties.