logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.11.29 2013고단2231
공문서변조등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for eight months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around April 21, 2013, the Defendants: (a) received the request from the competent authority to issue a business report certificate on Mada P, a resting restaurant; (b) subsequently, accepted the request from Defendant A to alter the contents of the safety facilities, etc. completion certificate on Mada; and (c) Defendant A conspired to issue a business report certificate on Mada from the competent authority to a general restaurant, by submitting it to the competent authority.

Defendant

B, around 14:00 on April 29, 2013, at the G office in the operation of Defendant B located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, on April 15, 2013, the Defendant submitted to the public official in charge of the modification of the foregoing safety facilities, etc., one copy of the certificate of completion of the safety facilities, etc., altered as above to Defendant A, and the Defendant submitted the modified certificate of completion of the safety facilities, etc. to the public official in charge of the public official in charge of the modification of the environment sanitation in the name of Sungnam-si, the chief of the fire station, and one copy of the altered certificate of completion of the safety facilities, etc., as seen above, from the revised office of the Ministry of Environment in the name of Sungnam-si, which was recorded on a computer on the column of business type, and one copy of the altered certificate of completion of the safety facilities, etc. in the office as seen above.

As a result, the Defendants, in collusion, altered one copy of the certificate of completion of safety facilities, etc. in the name of the chief of Sungnam fire station, which is an official document, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the complete certificate of safety facilities;

1. Articles 225, 229, and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Criminal Act, the suspension of execution;

arrow