logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.12.24 2013구단54178
추가상병불승인결정처분취소 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s disposition of refusal to grant additional injury and disease to the Plaintiff on January 17, 2013 is revoked.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 6, 2012, the Plaintiff was subject to an occupational accident (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) resulting from the steel text, and received a diagnosis of “patum 2” (hereinafter “patum 2”), and completed medical treatment on July 21, 2013.

B. On January 10, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for approval of additional injury and disease with respect to “Aggravated Maternal Maternal Madiode (hereinafter “instant additional injury and disease”). However, on January 17, 2013, the Defendant rejected the application on the ground that the instant additional injury and disease have no proximate causal relation with the instant accident.

(hereinafter “instant No. 1 Disposition”). (c)

On July 25, 2013, the Defendant determined and notified the Plaintiff’s disability grade No. 11-7 of the Plaintiff’s disability grade due to the instant injury to the Plaintiff (the remaining persons of the Plaintiff’s disability in light of the Do’s Do’s Do’s Do’s Do’s Do’s Do’s la

(hereinafter referred to as “instant Disposition 2”). [Ground of recognition] A without dispute, A 2-1 through 4-3, and 8 through 10

2. Whether the first disposition in this case is lawful

A. Since the instant additional injury and disease occurred due to the Plaintiff’s assertion, the instant disposition was unlawful on a different premise.

B. (1) Medical opinion (1) The medical opinion’s medical opinion’s medical opinion’s medical opinion (as of December 31, 2012, 2012, KaTol University Ebiopia Hospital): The medical opinion’s medical opinion’s medical opinion’s medical opinion’s medical opinion’s (as of February 21, 2013, 201) : The medical opinion’s medical opinion’s opinion’s medical opinion’s opinion’s opinion’s opinion’s MOI damage to the luminous disorder is the complete urology of the bombia that was caused by the bombal disorder’s damage to spine, and thus, the bombia’s medical opinion’s bombia examination in the main chapter of the advisory opinion

As a normal view (paturology, urology and urology measurement) with 447llock in 23l/s and urology, it is not visible to caturology. (3) The head of the Seoul Hospital at Macheon National University (Baturology).

arrow