logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.10.30 2014구단6329
장해등급결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. 이 사건 처분 원고는 2010. 5. 4. 시내버스 미션본카바 교체 작업 중 허리를 삐끗하여 그 무렵 ‘제5요추-1천추간 추간판 탈출증, 요추부 염좌, 척추수술실패증후군, 적응장애, 신경인성방광의 기능장애, 복합부위통증증후군’으로 요양승인을 받아 2013. 7. 25.까지 요양한 후 피고에게 장해급여를 청구하였다.

On August 27, 2013, the defendant adjusted the final disability grade to the plaintiff 10 [11th grade (1st grade in the Gyeongdo, 12th grade 5, 12th grade (12th grade 5, 12th grade 5, 12th grade 5, 14th grade , 14th grade , 14th grade , 14th grade ) of the 11th grade of the chronological disorder, and 11th grade (1st grade in the chronological response to urology), 3rd grade of the chronological disorder (12th grade 5, 12th grade 5, 14th grade , 14th grade , 6th grade , 10];

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. Since the Plaintiff’s state of disability of spinal Nebal root disorder and composite partic partic partic partic partic partic partic partic partic partic partic partic partic partic partic partic partic partic partic partic partic partic

B. Since there is no evidence to deem that the Plaintiff’s vertebal root disorder and multiple brate fladism disorder constituted a higher level than the grade determined by the instant disposition, the instant disposition cannot be deemed unlawful.

3. Therefore, we cannot accept the Plaintiff’s claim.

arrow