logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.11.14 2018고단2987
의료법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding 3,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a business owner operating "C" in Seo-gu B 4, Seo-gu, Gwangju, and D, E, and F are female employees of the above business establishment.

1. No person who violates the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic (mediation, etc. of sexual traffic) shall arrange any similarity with an unspecified person using, or promising to receive, money, valuables or other property benefits, such as sexual intercourse, mouth or anus;

Nevertheless, the Defendant made an advertisement to suggest sexual traffic in the name of “H” in “G”, which is a brokerage site for Internet sexual traffic, and received KRW 150,000 from the unclaimed male descendants in the name of “H” around March 9, 2018, and provided the same 50,000 won among them to the above D, and arranged the same D to do the act of similarity at that place.

The Defendant, including that, from March 19, 2018 to March 19, 2018, engaged in engaging in commercial sex acts, such as arranging commercial sex acts, by means of the foregoing method, for a total of nine times as indicated in the list of crimes in attached

2. The accused who violated the Medical Service Act shall be from February 2, 2018 to the same year.

3. From the date of October 20 to the place described in paragraph 1, “C” employed employees F, etc. who did not obtain recognition of qualifications for massage companies while operating the “C” as above, provided guidance to the internal room by being provided by the nameless customers with an amount of KRW 60,000,000, and had the said F, etc. take care of or take charge of taking care of the land by hand.

As a result, the Defendant established a massage place even though he was not a massage doctor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against D, E, or F;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Details of pictures of sites for publicity of Internet sexual traffic, C on-site control photographs, and text messages;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (Attachment, such as daily revenue and expenditure status, card transfer records, etc.);

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow