logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.09.30 2016고단2973
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for ten months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On November 22, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic (such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic) was operating a sexual traffic business establishment on the trade name of “D” on the seven commercial premises located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, Gwangju, with the trade name of “D,” and had female employees find the said business place to have sexual intercourse against customers.

From November 22, 2015 to May 30, 2016, the Defendant installed 12 rooms with shower and simplified beds, etc. at the above business establishment from around November 22, 2015, and received 150,000 won from the name-free customers, which is an average of two customers per day, and provided guidance to the inside room, and let female employees do sexual intercourse with customers.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

B. The Defendant in violation of the Medical Service Act employed employees B, etc. who did not obtain recognition of the qualifications of massageman while operating “D” at the date, time, place, etc. set forth in paragraph (1), and provided guidance to the inside room by the employees, who received an amount equivalent to KRW 6-180,000 per day average 10 customers based on the course, and received guidance from the outside customers, and had the employees enjoy the land by hand or take charge of the work.

As a result, the Defendant established a massage place even though he was not a massage doctor.

2. A person who has not obtained recognition of his/her qualification as a massage club from the Mayor/Do Governor having jurisdiction over Defendant B shall not engage in massage for profit;

The Defendant did not obtain recognition of the qualification as a massage. From April 2016 to May 30, 2016, the Defendant received 100,000 won from the customers who found his place of work as an employee and received 100,000 won from the said “D” to the said “D,” and she mathed, such as taking care of, or taking care of, the said place.

Accordingly, the defendant did not obtain recognition of qualification as a massage for profit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement in the police interrogation protocol against the Defendants, E, and F

1. The record of seizure, a copy of the business registration certificate, and an investigation report (D business details).

arrow