beta
Cases
2016Do21240 Preparation of false official documents, and the exercise of false official documents
Defendant
A person shall be appointed.
Appellant
Military prosecutor;
Defense Counsel
Law Firm B, Attorney C
Judgment of the lower court
High Court for Armed Forces Decision 2016Do43 Decided November 1, 2016
Imposition of Judgment
June 15, 2017
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, it is justifiable for the court below to maintain the judgment of the court of first instance which acquitted the charged facts of this case on the ground that there is no proof of crime, and there is no error of law by misconception of facts or by misapprehending the legal principles as alleged in the
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Jo Hee-de
Justices Kim Chang-suk
Justices Park Sang-ok