logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017.6.29.선고 2017도5437 판결
공직선거법위반
Cases

2017Do5437 Violation of the Public Official Election Act

Defendant

A person shall be appointed.

Appellant

Prosecutor

Defense Counsel

Law Firm (LLC) D

Attorney F-ho et al.

Judgment of the lower court

Daegu High Court Decision 2017No42 decided March 30, 2017 (Separation)

Imposition of Judgment

June 29, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court did not prove the facts charged of this case.

The judgment of the court of first instance which acquitted the defendant was affirmed.

Examining the record, the above determination by the court below is justifiable. Contrary to logical and empirical rules

In violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or errors in the legal principles on contributions under the Public Official Election Act.

No error, such as impairing judgment or omitting judgment, shall be made.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

shall be determined.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Ko Young-han

Justices Kim Jae-tae

Justices Jo Hee-de

Justices Park Sang-ok

arrow