1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. After being appointed as a civilian military employee on July 1, 1980, the Plaintiff retired on March 31, 2014, when performing the maintenance work, such as working for the 2nd military branch as the Daegu Dam Dam Gam Stack Stackers in B, and retired on the 2nd military branch.

B. On April 16, 2014, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the head of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 3nd unit of the 3nd unit of the 3nd unit of the 3nd unit of the 3nd unit of the 3nd unit of the 4nd unit of the 10th unit of the 3nd unit of the 4nd unit of the 3nd unit of the 1st unit of the 4nd unit of the 2008 unit of the 3nd unit of the 1st unit of the 4th unit of the 1st unit of the 4th unit of the 4th unit of the 2008 unit of the 1st unit of the 2nd unit of the 4th unit of the vehicle.”

C. On July 1, 2014, the Defendant applied for the approval of the above medical care for the so-called "the Plaintiff's disease cannot be presumed to have occurred due to official duties because the cause of the outbreak is not clear, and there is no medical evidence that the Plaintiff's disease was caused due to the Plaintiff's working conditions or working environment, and it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff's injury and disease had a causal relationship with the injury, since it is not a medical opinion that it is difficult to view that there was a causal relationship with the injury, the Plaintiff's disease cannot be deemed to have a substantial causal relationship with the occupational duties."

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1-2, 3, Gap evidence 2-1, 2.2.