Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

around 15:50 on October 15, 2017, the Defendant committed each indecent act against the victim in a way that the victim F (V, 21 years of age), who was getting down from the line E of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D subway No. 7 Line, was her stairs, was her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 11 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and the Selection of Fines concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant did not commit an indecent act against the victim's defense counsel's assertion under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order.

In the records, the following circumstances, namely, the victim's statement is consistent with the victim's statement concerning the background of the movement and the behavior of the defendant before and after the movement, and the victim's statement concerning the movement of the defendant and the victim is consistent with the CCTV video. According to the victim's statement and CCTV video, the defendant was waiting the victim once again, the defendant was passing through the stairs installed in the subway platform, and the defendant was on board the first escalator connected to the opening entrance later than the victim after passing through the opening entrance, and the defendant was going again to go again, and the defendant was on board the first escalator. However, the defendant was on board the second escalator that is linked later to the victim later on the ground than the victim, and the defendant was on board the second escalator that is linked later on the ground, and the defendant exceeded the speed of damage to the defendant.