The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) found the Defendant guilty on the ground that the Defendant did not commit an indecent act against the victim as shown in the facts charged.

2. The Defendant alleged to the same purport in the lower court, but the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on account of the following reasons: (a) the victim’s investigative agency and the statement at the lower court’s court court to the effect that the Defendant committed an indecent act against himself as in the facts charged: (b) the Defendant applied for the victim since the passage through which the Defendant was engaged in drilling; and (c) took the victim’s knife and took the knife; and (d) the victim took the knife and took the knife the knife of the knife; and (d)

If the judgment of the court below is examined closely by comparison with the records, it is just for the court below to have judged guilty of the facts charged in this case for the same reasons as the reasoning of its reasoning, and there is no violation of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts (it does not interfere with the recognition of an indecent act, even if the defendant got ahead of the victim on the refund boarding platform in which the prosecution took place and arrived first on the subway platform). 3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.