beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for ten months.
Defendant 1 through 6 of the seized evidence.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On September 13, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor by means of computer, etc. at the order of the Gwangju District Court, etc. on May 10, 2013, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on May 10, 201. Defendant B was sentenced to five months of imprisonment with prison labor by larceny at an Ansan Branch of the Suwon District Court on October 28, 201, and on April 5, 2012, Defendant B completed the execution of the sentence on January 10, 2013.
[2014 Highest 3044] - Defendants
1. Defendant AF, who was living together with Defendant A, and G, who was not a length to prepare living expenses and innbs, etc. in Ansan-si, along with Defendant A and G, to display a letter of sale as if they sold goods on the Internet, and to receive money as a price for sales of goods from the victims who reported and contacted the letter, and Defendant A and G agreed to provide NAV ID, bank account, handphone, and handphone, which are necessary for the above crime, and released the amount of damage from the account deposited in the account provided for the crime as above.
F, on March 27, 2014, the Defendant, and G made a false statement to the victim J who contacted by using a computer located in the I’s unit H located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and by accessing the Internet NAVER’s website to “balgno-si mobile phone sales”, and reporting it to the victim J. (hereinafter “Walgno-si mobile phone sales”).
However, F, Defendant, and G did not have a cell phone jumthy jumthy jumthy, and there was no intention to sell the cell phone.
F, the Defendant, and G received total of KRW 200,000 from the victim’s new bank account (K) in the name of G on the same day, and from around that time to April 29, 2014, the sum of KRW 3,490,000, as shown in attached Table 1, was delivered from around 18 times in total.
Accordingly, the defendant is F and G.