logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2021.03.31 2020고정1088
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 8, 2020, around 22:00, the Defendant assaulted the victim by breaking the victim's chest part of his chest with the two descendants in the middle of the noise problem between floors D before the front door of the victim of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul apartment C, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Investigation report (related to telephone communications of one E Commission member);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (related to the submission of a written confirmation and a photograph of victim);

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument is that the defendant found the victim's house on the upper upper floor of the apartment and divided the level to resist the noise between floors.

The victim had a string of the string of the string of the string of the string, and the Defendant had a string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string,

2. The subject of the determination was in the court and in the investigative agency of this law, the accused was tightly and was inside the front door while going beyond.

In the case of three water, they met with water in the middle of three water, and they met with water.

The victim is consistently and specifically stated in another consistent statement (as to the part which is lower part of the victim's house-to-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-s to-sto-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to

Although the statement was corrected, the statements in this case are consistent with the same regarding the assault of this case. The victim complained against the correspondence at one Council member following the day of this case.

arrow