1. The Defendant: (a) from February 6, 2016 to Plaintiff A, KRW 300,00,00, respectively, for each of the KRW 5,305,356, Plaintiff B, C, and D.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) On February 6, 2016, Plaintiff A is the driver of Fone Star Vehicle, and Plaintiff B, C, and D are the children of Plaintiff A. 2) Plaintiff A driving the said vehicle on board with Plaintiff B, C, and D on the front side of the entrance of the gold-gu, Two-dong, Busan, for a stop of a signal change. The signal change was made on the front side of the entrance of the gold-gu, Two-dong, Busan, for the following reasons: (a) Plaintiff A was the driver of the Fone Star Vehicle; (b) Plaintiff B, C, and D was the child of Plaintiff A; and (c) Plaintiff A was injured by each direction, c, and tension.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) The Defendant is a mutual aid association to which the said bus is admitted. [Grounds for recognition] The Defendant is not a dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 4, and 5 (if available, the number is included) and the purport of the entire pleadings.

B. According to the facts of recognition of the above liability, the accident in this case occurred due to the violation of the duty of safe operation of bus drivers, and thus, the defendant who is the mutual aid association is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the accident in this case

(Plaintiff B, C, and D claim consolation money only). 2. Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages, it shall be as stated in the attached Table of Calculation of Compensation Amount, and it shall be rejected that the parties’ assertion did not separately state.

The amount of damages shall be discarded less than the won and less than the month of the last month, and the amount shall be calculated according to the reduction rate which deducts the interim interest at the rate of 5/12 percent per month at the time of the accident.

The term "basic matters" in the attached list of damages calculation sheet shall be as stated in the actual income (1).

(2) On June 1, 2008, Plaintiff A entered into a transportation vehicle service contract with I Co., Ltd. and received monthly KRW 4,000,000,000 from June 1, 200, and thus, the above amount should be recognized as an average monthly income. However, the Plaintiff, an individual business income holder, who received the service cost from the said company, should be recognized as an average monthly income. However, the Plaintiff’s interest, management expenses, and taxes and public charges, etc., which