Text
1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months;
However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B On November 1, 2016, the Jeju District Court sentenced 8 months of imprisonment for special injury, violation of the Child Welfare Act and 2 years of suspended execution on November 19, 2016, and became final and conclusive on November 19, 2016.
1. The Defendants’ co-principal
A. On April 2016, the Defendants filed a false report on fraudulent damage and an application for remedy for damage with a view to having known from the time of middle school, and on April 24, 2016, the trade name in the Asia-dong cannot be known. As Defendant A was unable to receive dividends through Defendant B’s account while gambling at an illegal gambling site, Defendant A filed a false report with the police as if he/she suffered telecommunications-based financial fraud (loan) damages based on the details of the deposit at the gambling site. Defendant A submitted the “accident confirmation Board” issued by the police to a financial institution, thereby making the illegal gambling site operation account suspended payment, thereby making the illegal gambling site operation account suspended payment, and even if the Defendants received money from the gambling site operator or failed to do so, the illegal gambling site operator was unable to raise an objection against the application for suspension of payment, and received the refund from the financial institution due to the lapse of the claim due to the process, and was in mind to acquire property profits.
1) According to the above conspiracy, the Defendants of the obstruction of the performance of official duties by fraudulent means: (a) informed Defendant B of false reports; (b) visited Defendant B, around April 24, 2016, the Namdong-dong Police Station South-gu, Jeju-do, Jeju-do, Jeju-do, Jeju-do, Jeju-do, and then transferred money to a person who assumes the friendship; and (c) notwithstanding the fact that there was no telecommunications-based financial fraud damage from remitting money to a person who assumes the friendship, the Defendants prepared a false statement that “the person who assumes the friendship was damaged by KRW 100,000,000,000,000 won,” and deposited the D bank account in the name of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd and the corporate bank account in the name