logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.06.14 2019고단667
위계공무집행방해등
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months;

2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant C’s imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) at Jeju District Court on August 17, 2017, with prison labor for ten months and two years of suspension of execution as declared by the court of Jeju District Court on August 25, 2017. The judgment becomes final and conclusive on August 25, 2017, and is still under suspension of execution.

Defendant

F On July 14, 2016, the Jeju District Court sentenced eight months of imprisonment for the crime of aiding and abetting a criminal, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence in the Jeju Prison on December 12, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

I. On July 13, 2018, Defendant B and C, along with Defendant A, who became aware of in the same region, deposited money with the account of gambling in the account of the illegal gambling site operation in the vicinity of Doldong-si, and returned money again to the police as if they were damaged by telecommunications-based financial fraud (loan fraud) based on the details of the deposit. Defendant B and C submitted the “accident Verification Board” issued by the police to the financial institution, thereby making a false report to the police in the state of suspending payment in the account of illegal gambling site operation, resulting in the suspension of payment by submitting the “accident Verification Board” issued by the police to the financial institution, and then, even if the same was not received money from the operator of the gambling site from the operator of the gambling site on condition that it would not raise an objection against the application for the suspension of payment, the illegal gambling site operator was unable to obtain a refund of damage in accordance with the claim extinguishment procedure from the financial institution

1. Defendant B, C, and A of the obstruction of performance of official duties by fraudulent means according to the above public offering relationship as seen above, Defendant C confirmed the gambling site account to be transferred the cash deposited by Defendant B as of July 13, 2018, and Defendant B deposited KRW 90,000 from the said K account to the K account in the name of the principal (L) around 21:39 on the same day after receiving cash from Defendant B, and then transferred KRW 90,000 from the said K account to the K account in the name of M (N) which is the deposit account of the gambling site from July 17, 2018.

arrow