A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 18, 2018, the Defendant, a person operating C in Kimpo-si B, controlled the violation of the Clean Air Conservation Act, such as failing to report the commencement of operation of emission facilities (Separation facilities) from E (52 years of age), a special judicial police official of Kimpo-si.

Accordingly, from around 13:03 to 13:49 on December 19, 2018, the Defendant called the above E in the course of performing the duty of regulating, guiding, and dealing with environmental offenders in the Kimpo-si Kimpo-si, F, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and "in waiting for width..............." the Defendant threatened the above E with the paper document while finding out in the above D around 14:05 on the same day, when the paper document was dried up while talking about the above E and the above control case, the Defendant assaulted the E at one face on the face of this E, and the above paper “Isn't have to do so,” and “Isn't have to see”, and “Isn't have to see it, as soon as Isn't have died.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate performance of official duties concerning the control, guidance, and related treatment of environmental offenders E by the special judicial police assistant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the 112 Reporting List, the photographs of damaged parts, documents and photographs related to environmental control, and the Acts and subordinate statutes of a record;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act - The defendant misleads the defendant.

- The Defendant threatened a public official in charge of crackdown to die, found a public office and brought a face with paper documents, brought a new brue, and made intimidation.

On December 28, 2018, when the defendant sent a prior notice of administrative disposition on December 28, 2018, the damaged public official tried not to accept the case.