1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a company aimed at manufacturing, installing, and selling various machinery. The defendant is a person who joined the plaintiff company on October 20, 1979 and served as a material management employee from December 11, 200 to March 10, 2009.

[1] When a trader submits a written request for goods stating the quantity, etc. of the necessary parts, the employee in charge of material management shall enter the materials, quantity, etc. connected to the procurement logistics system into the procurement logistics system and obtain approval from the person with authority for approval, such as the team leader. 2) The procurement logistics system shall indicate the inventory of various parts held by the Plaintiff Company in the electronic form. 1) If the electronic inventory is more than the requested quantity of the transaction company, 2) if the inventory is less than the requested quantity of the transaction company in the electronic form, the quantity that can be immediately removed is less than the requested quantity of the transaction company, 3) the quantity that can be immediately removed in the warehouse, but not in the electronic form, the quantity actually existing in the warehouse is indicated as the “contract quantity”, and 3) the

3) The sum of the “written order” and the “pre-paid volume” are automatically calculated by the “written order”. (4) When a material management employee who received the approval of paragraph (1) of the said Article enters the “written order”, which is the actual quantity taken out in the procurement logistics system, printed out a certificate of carrying out, and signed by the pre-written authority, and delivers it to the trader with the signature of the pre-written authority, the trader is entitled to receive parts in accordance with the “written order” as indicated in the certificate of carrying out. (5) The warehouse employee in charge of storage automatically processes the “unclaimed quantity” using the bar code indicated in the certificate of carrying out. In the procurement logistics system, the “unclaimed quantity” was indicated according to the “outbound quantity” or “outbound quantity” of the transaction company, which is not the “outbound quantity” indicated in the certificate of carrying out.

6 The Plaintiff shall pay parts to the trader according to the “unexplosed volume” recorded in the procurement logistics system.