1. The Defendant’s KRW 23,145,723 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% as prescribed by the Civil Act from April 9, 2016 to December 15, 2016.

On January 16, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Defendant to supply parts of the golf strings produced and supplied by the Defendant to the Defendant to the Dongyang Co., Ltd. (the trade name was changed to D, Co., Ltd., Ltd.) (hereinafter “D”)

Article 1 – In principle, the defendant shall receive parts from the plaintiff.

ARTICLE 2 – The plaintiff shall make every effort to the quantity and payment period of materials so that the schedule of the production and delivery of the defendant may progress without interruptions.

In lieu, when the delivery of MP Q, which is reflected by the class company, is required, the defendant grants permission for the quantity of the plaintiff's supply.

- The Plaintiff shall endeavor to reduce the burden of inventory by sharing the ordered volume of materials with the Defendant.

Article 4 – Contract Terms shall be five years from January 10, 2014, and shall be automatically extended one year if the written notice of termination of the contract is not given at least one month before the contract expires.

On January 11, 2016, Defendant employees demanded the replacement of parts of the parts entered into on January 6, 2016 to Plaintiff employees before 2013.

Defendant employees demanded on January 18, 2016 that the employee of the Plaintiff inform the Plaintiff of the inventory status of the Plaintiff’s parts, and January 6, 2016; and

15. 15. Requests the replacement of old parts among each of the parts stored.

Accordingly, on January 18, 2016, the reason why the employee of the Plaintiff should be informed of the inventory status to the employee of the Defendant and grasp the inventory status, so it is difficult to inform the Speaker of the inventory status, and on the exchange of old parts, he/she directly asked Dalian about whether there was an obstacle to use in Dalian with respect to the exchange of old parts.

Accordingly, on January 19, 2016, the defendant's employee demanded the exchange of old parts in order to identify the inventory status in order to identify the inventory status in the supply of old parts to the plaintiff's employee.