logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2016.02.16 2015고단554
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 554] On February 6, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving), etc. in the support of the Chungcheong District Court, and on October 15, 2015, the Defendant requested a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same offense to the same court and continues to exist.

On December 5, 2015, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle of approximately 100 meters in the section of C New Car without obtaining a driver’s license from the front day of the YAP in his/her he/she was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.182% during his/her blood transfusion, to the front day of the same both documents.

[2016 Height 9]

1. On December 13, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving a C body-man car without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of about 28km from around the 31-1stm from the 31-1stm, Yari-ri, Yari-ri, Yari-ri, Yari-ri, Yari-ri, Yari-ri, Yari-ri, Yari-si, Yari

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the last vehicle for the vehicle in C in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the Violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving).

On December 15, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver's license, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.158% from blood alcohol level from around 23:57 on December 15, 2015, and led the Defendant to drive the said car along three-lanes from the area of training elementary school to the area of gold hill distance from the area of the training elementary school.

At the time, there is an intersection where signal lights are installed at night and at the front, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by putting a person engaged in driving service at front and accurately manipulating all the devices of the vehicle, such as steering wheels and brakes, and to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, runs away from the E G2X car driven by the victim D, who was in the atmosphere of the signal as it was due to negligence.

arrow