The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant sold alcoholic beverages to them at the time and place indicated in the facts charged with being aware that E, etc. is a juvenile, and that the judgment below which acquitted the Defendant is erroneous by misapprehending the legal principles.

2. We examine the judgment of the court below, consistent with G, H, and E, and F, which arrived first and later, presented a false adult identification card at the time of the instant case, are consistent in the court of the court below. ① The remainder of E and F, other than E and F, presented a false adult identification card at the D main points operated by the Defendant, and did not undergo the Defendant’s identification card inspection on the same day, ② Four persons (G, H, L, and M) arrive first while driving, and 4 persons arrive first, after the first 10 minutes, were re- until E and F were flowed later, and almost almost after E and F were flowed together (after approximately 10~20 seconds). ③ At the same time, the above D and D were mixed with Defendant at the D main points, and the above e and F were ice, and the above e and the above e and e were not mentioned further.

In addition, it is difficult to view that E/F had time to verify whether it is a juvenile from the time of entry into the above main point to the time of control, and there is no other evidence to prove the facts charged of this case.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below that acquitted the defendant is legitimate, and the prosecutor's mistake and assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.