Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall sell, lend, or distribute alcoholic beverages that are drugs harmful to juveniles to juveniles.

Nevertheless, around 22:00 on January 5, 2020, the Defendant sold alcoholic beverages, such as 1 disease, etc., which are drugs harmful to juveniles, to D (the age of 17) from the fifth floor of the 5th floor of Goyang-gu building B (hereinafter “instant main shop”) operated by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F, D, G, and H;

1. Statement made by the police officer in relation to H;

1. Each Defendant stated in each investigation report (Evidence Nos. 50, 88), and 112 report processing case list, the following facts are denied: D’s identification examination at the main points of this case; D’s identification examination was conducted; D’s body is rhymless in size 180cc high; G’s identification card and face are similar to G’s personal identification card and head transfer; and the Defendant was not found to have known that D’s wife’s juvenile was admitted to the main points of this case; at the time of the police being dispatched after receiving the report, D had a personal identification card at the time of being exposed to the police.

However, in full view of the following circumstances admitted by the evidence revealed earlier, the conviction of the Defendant at the time of entering the main points of the instant case that the juvenile D, at the time of entering the main points of the instant case, did not examine D’s identification, can be recognized as the facts charged of the instant case.

① Along with H, I, and J, the first-year vessel of high school, D entered the instant main point. D and H stated in the court that “I did not inspect the identification card at the time of entering the instant main point.”

D as a one-year line of high school, G was drinking at the instant main point prior to the instant driving of D, along with other daily behaviors. However, G stated in the court that “The police should report the crackdown on the main points of this case and that D, who is a double, sent his identification card to D,” and said D and H’s own identification card.