Seoul High Court 2009Nu7914 (Law No. 16, 2010)

Seoul Administrative Court 2007Guhap4504 ( October 23, 2009)

The legitimacy of the assertion that it is merely a working party at the construction site rather than an independent business operator;

It is reasonable to view the construction cost as the subcontractor who entered into a labor subcontract agreement as the receipt of a promissory note, and there is no data that can be viewed as an employee employed by the non-party company, such as entering into a labor contract or

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent