logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.07.16 2013고단3071
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 2, 2005, the defendant and C have registered and authorized the D 4th E childcare center in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul as representative F, and registered and authorized it as representative A on July 31, 2006, and around November 10, 2006, the defendant and C operated the 1st J childcare center in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul as representative K.

During the operation of child care centers, the Defendant and C paid 270,000 won per person per month to the child care teachers who have worked and worked for at least 15 days per month at the same facility, and provided 50,000 won per person per month to the child care teachers who have worked for at least 30 hours per month (at least 30 hours per week) while taking advantage of the fact that the child care teachers do not work properly, they want to falsely register the infant care teachers who have not worked for them with the family welfare and the welfare of Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, and to obtain the cost of improving the treatment and working environment of the false infant care teachers, as they are actually teachers.

Accordingly, the Defendant and C have colored childcare teachers to be registered falsely among those who were known to the general public. On November 201, 2010, upon request from L to L, the Defendant and C registered L as J childcare teachers on November 1, 2010, and upon request from M on August 27, 2012, M was issued with the qualification certificate for childcare teachers and the passbook in the name of M., and M was registered as H childcare teachers around August 27, 2012, upon request from M around October 201, and on November 1, 2012, N was registered as E childcare teachers.

On March 2013, the Defendant had access to the childcare integration support system using a computer at the above J childcare center and applied for improvement of treatment costs and working environment for L as if L had worked at the above childcare center.

However, it is true.

arrow