Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 19, 2015, at around 18:55, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s legitimate duties by force, such as obstructing the operation of the bus of the victim, who is a bus manager of the victim C (62 years of age, south) without any particular reason, who is a luminous community shuttle bus engineer of the victim C (62 years of age, south) by drinking on the street 69 p.m., along the village of Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, 2015, by preventing the operation of the bus of the victim, who is a bus engineer, without any particular reason.

2. On December 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 20:45 on December 20, 2015, the Defendant did not enter his own talk at the fluorial office in the fluorial office located in Sungnam-gu, Sungwon-gu, Sungwon-gu, Sungnam-gu, the other party fluor; (b) “A fluort, fluor, fluor, bitch, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, and fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor,” and fluor, at a government office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A criminal investigation report and an investigation report (the suspect's main cancellation column);

1. 112 Statement of report;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing vehicle booms, screen pictures and video CDs by cutting down a stude video;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of interference with business), and Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of interference with business within the official document), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the Defendant’s confession, reflectivity, records of identical crimes, obstruction of business, and the extent of the disturbance of revocation of the principal, the circumstances of the instant case, and the risk of the instant crime.