Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around December 23, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at around 22:25, 2015, the Defendant was assaulted by the Defendant at the “C main point” located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and received 112 reports from the Defendant, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the duty of reporting and handling reports by the police officer, by making the Defendant wear the shoulder of the above E one time and string the shoulder of the 112 police officer.

2. On December 23, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) G was assaulted against the Defendant at the D District Office located in the Dap District Office located in the Chungcheongnam-nam District; (b) around December 23, 2015.

state his statement to G, “Irson’s speech to the police officer;

The term "Woo", "Woo", and "Woo-Woo", and "Woo-Woo-Woo", and "Woo-Woo-Woo-Woo", took a bath for police officers who control G, and 23:00 on the same day, the police police police officers, who were government offices, committed an act of disturbance for revocation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H, G, and E;

1. An investigation report (in relation to the time during which the act in the official book is the time specified for the revocation thereof);

1. Application of relevant photographs, and photographs of damage caused by interference with execution of public duties to Acts and subordinate statutes to the cancellation of public order;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbing the revocation of notes in official books), and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the Defendant’s mistake, the fact that there is no record of the same kind of crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered, and all of the sentencing conditions specified in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.