logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.03.16 2016고단7241
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 10, 2016, at the entrance parking lot of the victim C’s “D” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant interfered with the traffic of the vehicle on the floor without any justifiable reason, and interfered with the operation of the Deputy Commissioner by force of the victim by avoiding disturbance by avoiding disturbance.

2. Around 13:10 on November 10, 2016, the Defendant insultd the Defendant at the place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article, where the Defendant reported 112 as a result of interference with the Defendant’s business, and the police box belonging to the Suwon Police Station Epic Station of the Suwon Police Station, which was called out after being reported 112, prevented the Defendant by the private victim F, who was the Defendant, and who was asked about the circumstances of the instant case, the Defendant was the Defendant “YY, YY, YY, N

야, 이 개새끼야. 야, 이 개 좆같은 새끼야. 씨 발 새끼야. 개새끼야. 븅 신새끼” 라는 등으로 수회 욕설하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender on November 10, 2016 due to interference with business affairs and a suspicion of insult; and (b) went to the police station E district of the Suwon-gu Suwon Police Station G located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si; and (c) until 14:40 on the same day.

1. Dried shacks, knife, knife, knife and knife

둬. 개 좆같은 새끼들 아. 한번 해보자. 개 썅놈의 새끼야 ”라고 수회 욕설을 하고, 고성을 지르는 등으로 관공서 내에서 주 취소란 행위를 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement with respect to C and F;

1. Application of the provisions of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written statement of the circumstances of a person who takes drinking, drinking, photographing and photographing;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Punishment Act, Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (a point of disturbance in revocation of the main sentence), and selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The provision of the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act for the aggravation of concurrent crimes [the punishment shall be aggravated for concurrent crimes with the punishment stipulated by the most serious obstruction of business (the above provision shall be applicable];

arrow