logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.12.01 2016누54086
하수도원인자부담금 부과처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the dismissal or addition of some of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is consistent with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The defendant in the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be "the head of women's Gun", and the defendant in the seventh part shall be deemed to be "the head of women's Gun", respectively.

The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance is "(c)" of the first part, "(d)" of the 11th part of the judgment, "(d)" of the 13th part is "ma", and "ma." of the 16th part is "f.", respectively.

The following shall be added to the second 10th of the judgment of the first instance.

C. On September 23, 2013, the name of the administrative district was changed to the female-si on September 23, 2013. Accordingly, the operator of the instant project was also changed to the defendant at the female-head of the Si/Gun (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “defendant”).

. The second-class 18th judgment of the first instance court is to add “A evidence 1-3,” following the first-class 18.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow