logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.05.03 2017노9633
명예훼손
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. In full view of the testimony of H’s witness of the lower court and the comments and comments on this case, the Defendant posted a notice on the Internet car page as shown in the lower court’s decision.

Although it is reasonable to see that the judgment of the court below that acquitted the defendant is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

2. On the grounds indicated in its reasoning, the lower court, on the ground that there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant posted the instant notice on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

In light of the facts charged, the lower court acquitted the instant charges.

Comprehensively taking account of the circumstances found by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is no error in the misapprehension of facts as alleged by the prosecutor.

3. The appeal of this case by the public prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the appeal of this case is without merit.

arrow