All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant’s posting of this case is not a foreign expressive material, and even though the Defendant did not have the purpose of a foreign act while posting the posting of this case, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentence against the Defendant by the Prosecutor (ten months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and confiscation) is too unfluent and unfair.

2. The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts, (i) the defendant is a desirable method of unification, (ii) the defendant is in concert with the North Korean system, and North Korea is a political right that has legitimacy and legitimacy, and (iii) the contents of the notice of this case are those of North Korea's logic, (iv) the contents of the notice of this case are those of North Korea's system or ideology, (iv) the fact that many experts stated in the court below to affirm the objection of the notice of this case in the court below, (iv) the defendant's age and social experience are consistent, and North Korea's overall context, the circumstances surrounding the notice of this case's propaganda, and (v) the defendant's expression of this case's expression of this case's expression of this case's expression of this case's expression of this case's expression of this case's expression of this case's expression of this case's expression of this case's expression of this case's purpose.

3. The notice of this case at issue regarding the prosecutor's improper argument of sentencing is the Korean system and history.