logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.10.24 2019고단5647
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine of one hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in driving a observer car B.

1. On July 17, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) (U.S.) driving the said vehicle at around 16:35, and driving the said vehicle at around 16:35, and driving the four-lane road in front of the Seoul Southern-gu, Incheon, along the one-lane distance from the parallel T.T.

There was a road where the passage of a vehicle was frequent, and there was an intersection where signal lights are installed on the front side, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to stop at the front of the Defendant’s driving direction by negligence while driving in the front of the Defendant’s driving direction, and received the part of the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle behind the car, which was driven by the victim E (the age of 26) who was parked in the front of the Defendant’s driving direction.

The Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt ties and tensions, which require treatment for about three weeks, and, at the same time, escaped without immediately stopping the damaged vehicle, without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim, even though it damages the damaged vehicle to the repair cost equivalent to KRW 628,626.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act, as described in the above paragraph (1), destroyed the part of the part of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was parked in the front of the J-learning G apartment Hdong, which was owned by the victim I while escaping, to be the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and damaged the repair cost equivalent to KRW 596,550, and damages the part of the repair cost, which was continuously parked in the front of the Defendant’s vehicle. The Defendant destroyed the part of the part of the Defendant’s vehicle following the N-Sexton sports cargo vehicle, which was parked in the front of the Defendant’s vehicle, to be the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

arrow