beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.
Defendant
If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On March 10, 2018, around 20:15, the Defendant: (a) asked the police officer belonging to the F District Police Station in Busan, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 after assaulting the Defendant’s pro rata E; and (b) expressed the Defendant’s desire to “Ise Ise Ise Ise Ise Ise Ise Is, Ise Ise Ise Ise Ise Ise Is off Ise Is, Ise Is off Isse Ise Ise Is off Is, Ise Is the face part of the above G and Hs on one occasion.
Then, the Defendant arrested a flagrant offender in F District located in Busan, U.S. at around 21:00 on the same day for the foregoing reasons, and expressed that he was asked by the above H about the circumstances of the instant case, and that he was asked by the above H, and that he was given the above H the face part of H one time as his head.
Ultimately, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports as above.
2. The Defendant committed the crime of Defendant B, around 20:15 on the same day, was arrested by Defendant B from the police officer G, who was called up after receiving the above D Apartment No. 306 402, and 112 on the same day, and Defendant B arrested Defendant B as a current offender from the police officer G, who was the police officer, and Defendant B’s arrest of Defendant B as Defendant B, and Defendant B’s above police officer.
It is a problem of family kisia.
why is to arrest us or not
“The body of the said G and H was pushed down with both arms, and the body of the said G and H was pushed down.
Then, at around 21:05 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) discovered any defect in the investigation of A who was arrested as a flagrant offender for the foregoing reason; (b) caused the bucks part of the above H’s bucks on one occasion.
Ultimately, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports as above.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each police statement in E, H and G;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;
1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act
1. Trade name;