The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the court below’s duly adopted and investigated evidence, the court below’s aforementioned determination is just, and there was no error of misunderstanding of facts, such as the prosecutor’s assertion.

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion cannot be accepted.

(1) In the police investigation, the victim is asked from the police officer to whether he her her fly fly fly fly fly fly, the victim is asked from the police officer to her fly fly fly fly fy, to her w w her w w w her w w w her w w her w her fy, and to remove her fy w her fy w her fry, and then her pan fy fy

“The 19th page of the evidence record) of the Defendant’s statement was made, and the Defendant’s house was asked to answer questions about how there was the house of the Defendant, and the answer was made, and there was a brupt of the so-called brupt and the so-called brupt and the so-called brupted **, and there was also a brupt of the so-called brupted brue.

and up to now, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.

5천 원을 계속 계속 해서 달라, 받아 오라고 해서 힘들었는데 그 땐 아저씨가 없다고 해 가지고 나갔는데 나가려고 하는데 아저씨가 갑자기 오라고 해서, 여기에 제가 여기까지 왔어요.

Therefore, the following statement was made by the Defendant: “I am off and am off and am off.” In light of these statements, there is doubt that the Defendant was off and am off the victim’s will and panty, and am out of the victim’s am.”

dr. but d.