logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 (창원) 2018.02.01 2017나21650
등기명의인표시변경등기말소청구
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 22, 2002, “Final Group A” completed the registration of ownership transfer on the land listed in attached Table No. 1 as a result of sale on the same day, and completed the registration of ownership preservation on the building listed in attached Table No. 2 on December 5, 2003.

(hereinafter referred to as "each of the real estate of this case" in addition to the land and buildings listed in the attached list.

As to each real estate of this case, ① the change of the name of the registered titleholder “C” from the end of March 12, 2007 due to the change of the name on March 12, 2007, received on March 16, 2007, the name of the registered titleholder was changed from “C” to “C”; ② the change of the registered titleholder’s name was changed from “C” to “B”, and the name was changed from “Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-do K” to “J, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do,” on the ground of “the change of the registered titleholder’s name on May 10, 2007” as “the change of the registered titleholder’s name was changed from “C” to “B”; ③ the change of the registered titleholder’s name was changed from “Seoul-do, Chungcheongnam-do” to “Seoul-do, Cheongcheon-do,” and the registered titleholder’s name was changed to “Seoul-do, Cheongcheon-gun,” respectively.

The registration of change of each indication in the above registered titleholder shall be referred to as "registration of change of each indication in the case."

(ii) [Ground of recognition] unsatisfy, entry in Gap evidence 6 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply).

- The purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of a lawsuit

가. 원고 주장의 요지 피고의 대표자 F은 원래 ‘종단 G’의 산하 지회인 ‘종단 A’의 대표자로 있었는데, ‘종단 G’의 분열을 기화로 독립하여 자신을 신격화하는 별도의 독자적 종교단체인 피고를 만들고, 이 사건 각 부동산의 소유권등기 명의인 표시를 원고의 명칭인 ‘종단 A’에서 피고의 명칭인 ‘B’로 변경하는 등기를 마침으로써 원고의 재산을 가로챘다.

Therefore, this case.

arrow