logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.03.28 2017나58488
등기명의인표시변경등기말소청구
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The end group A completed the registration of ownership transfer as the receipt No. 48273 on August 25, 2005 with respect to the land listed in the separate sheet 1 and the buildings listed in the separate sheet 2 (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”).

B. Since then on May 10, 2007, as to each of the instant real estate, Gwangju District Court No. 21490, Dec. 31, 2008, changed the name of Sejong District Court from No. 21490, Dec. 31, 2008 to B, the priority order of change of indication registration No. 2-1, hereinafter referred to as “the change of indication registration No. 2008,” refers to the change of indication

A. On the same ground as of May 10, 201, Gwangju District Court No. 98600 on May 24, 2011, changed the B’s address from Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-do to Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, and hereinafter “The instant change of the order of change of indication No. 2-2, the registration of change of the name of registration No. 2, the title of registration No. 2, the title of registration No. 2, the title of registration No. 2, the title of registration No. 201,

(B) A. [The facts that there was no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in Gap evidence 6-1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination on the legitimacy of a lawsuit

가. 원고 주장의 요지 피고의 대표자 H은 원래 원고의 대표자 지위에 있었는데, 종단 I의 분열을 기화로 자신을 신격화하는 별도의 독자적 종교단체인 피고를 만들고, 이 사건 각 부동산에 관하여 “종단 A” 즉 원고에서 “B” 즉 피고로 이 사건 각 표시변경등기를 마침으로써 원고의 재산을 가로챘다.

Therefore, each registration of change of indication of this case, which was completed with respect to each real estate of this case, constitutes an unlawful registration made by a method that undermines the identity of the registered titleholder, and thus constitutes an invalidation registration not based on the intention of the plaintiff, who is the

(b) Registration of the change of indication of one titleholder is made illegally in a manner that impairs the identity of the titleholder;

arrow