logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.05.10 2018고단187 (1)
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C is a vocational employer who operates a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name of “H” from the 2nd floor of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, and B is the head of the above business establishment as the wife of C.

No person shall arrange, etc. sexual traffic for business purposes.

On May 23, 2017, the Defendant, in collusion with C and C’s wife, was equipped with five smuggling and shower facilities, etc., and employed by the female employees (one J, K, and L) on his/her name, and received 140,000 won from male customers one time of sexual traffic, and let the said female employees to have sexual intercourse with the male guests, and the Defendant sent male guests recruited by the said sexual traffic to H, and received 20,000 won per customer in return for mediating sexual traffic and arranging sexual traffic. B lent the name of the employer to C and was controlled by the said business, and was investigated by the police as the employer.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with C and B to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant, B or C in the first trial record;

1. Statement made by the police against V, W, X;

1. Written statements of Y, and Z;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Investigation reports (Attachment of Defendant’s sound recording files);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal accidents (in cases of indoor emergency devices to cope with crackdowns);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense / [Selection of a punishment penalty]

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not have the same criminal record as the defendant, and the degree of participation in the crime is relatively insignificant, and the sentencing conditions indicated in the record, such as the defendant’s age, occupation, sex, sex, family relationship, living environment, circumstances leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following factors:

arrow