Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a Do farm machinery store in Nam-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul, for the sale and repair of used agricultural machinery.

On January 20, 2015, at around 22:00, the Defendant purchased 50 million won or more of the market price, which was the victim F, which was the victim F, which was stolen by E, from the front side of the sub-solid apartment in the Mapo-Eup, Kim Jong-si, Kimcheon-si.

E sales of the above Twitter was merely 15 years of age, and the defendant demanded that he pay 20 million won in cash. Since the twitter was damaged, the defendant, who is engaged in the business of selling the second good machinery, has a duty of care to confirm whether he is stolen by examining well his personal information, the owner, the process of acquisition of the agricultural machinery sold, the motive for sale, the price suitable for the transaction rate, and whether he has a duty of care to confirm whether he is in possession of the tax-free oil card.

Nevertheless, as the defendant neglected to make a judgment on the stolen by neglecting it, the defendant acquired the stolen property by purchasing the Track in cash of KRW 20 million.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination protocol of suspect E by the prosecution (including the third and the sub-examination part);

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of each police protocol to H and I;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 364 and 362 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The primary criminal defendant is a person who operates D Farm Machinery Points in Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul.

On January 20, 2015, the Defendant acquired stolen goods from E in cash after being aware of the fact that E was a victim Fitter price of KRW 50 million at the front day of the sub-soft apartment in the Mapo-Eup, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, the Defendant acquired stolen goods at KRW 20 million, even though he was aware of the fact that E was a stolen price.

2. We examine the judgment.