A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 10, 2018, at around 20:50, the Defendant received a 112 report from “D” restaurant for the operation of the Daegu Seo-gu Office of Police Station E Zone B, stating that “A sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat

The above slopeF saw the Defendant to go to the “Hel” floor located in the Daegu-gu Office G located in the Defendant’s lodging room, and told the Defendant “Hel”, and used the bath to the effect that “this spacks and the police spacks are dead. The spacks are dead. The spacks are all dead of the spacks. The spacks of the spackf in both hand, and used the spacks of the above slopeF at one time, and used the sprinkf in drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (insected F Statements hearing);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. In order to establish the legal order of the country with reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act and eradicate the light of the public authority, there is a need to strictly punish the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and the Defendant has a record of having been punished several times as violent crimes.

However, considering the fact that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and repents his mistake, there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and the age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, means and result of the crime of this case, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime.