logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2019.09.26 2019고단296
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who is engaged in driving cars B and III cargo vehicles in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury)

On April 25, 2019, at around 21:10, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.148% with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.148%, and led the Defendant to drive the said vehicle in the direction of D village from the C village bank at the kingdo 42 nautical nautical miles of Chang-gun.

At the time, night was and there was a narrow one-lane road, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the steering employee by reducing the speed, displaying the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the steering system accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant failed to see the front side while under the influence of alcohol and failed to drive a motor vehicle properly while driving the motor vehicle at the right side of the road on the front side of the Defendant while driving the motor vehicle, and did not discover the Epoter II cargo vehicle that was parked at the right side of the road on the front side of the motor vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F (the age 61) who was on board the Defendant’s vehicle due to occupational negligence as above, such as 12 weeks of less than 12 weeks of age, such as scambling sckes, sckes, sckes, and sckes, and injury to the same victim G (the age 62) in need of approximately 6 weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.148% as stated in the above 1.1., and the Defendant driven the K Hawing-III truck at a section of about 10km from the 10km to the king-ri road located in the same king-ri 42, through the J restaurant located in I. In addition, the Defendant driven the K Ⅲ truck at a section of about 10km to the king-ri 42.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. On-site reports (on-site survey reports) and on-site photographs;

arrow