logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원장흥지원 2020.11.05 2020고단242
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Criminal power is a person who has been sentenced to a fine of KRW 700,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the application of the Gwangju District Court on April 5, 2007.

Criminal facts

1. Around September 21, 2020, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act ( sound driving) on September 21, 2020, the Defendant driven a G salary of 1 ton of the G salary of 31 ton of the G salary of 0.088% in the section of about 25km from the front of the C cafeteria located in Gangnam-gun, Gangnam-gun, Seoul through the roads in front of the D Village in the same military, via the roads in front of the same military, to the F. E. in the same military E.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

2. Around September 21, 2020, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (if the Defendant was involved in an accident), driving a G salary class III and one ton cargo vehicle on the roads in front of the D Village in Gangnam-gun, Jin-gun, Jinnam-gun, and proceeded from the lurical area to the lurical area of the Jindo-Eup.

At the time, the construction work was set up at the center of the road, and there was a red drum, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle for the purpose of preventing accidents, such as making the front door well and accurately manipulating the steering gear, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and had been able to avoid the management of the Victim H, Inc., Ltd., which was set up at the center of the above-wing and third cargo lanes due to the negligence of the Defendant, who was under the influence of alcohol, as described in Paragraph 1.

As a result, the Defendant destroyed three drums for the management of the victim due to such occupational negligence, thereby damaging the property equivalent to the total market value of KRW 30,000 and leaving the site without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report on actual condition, notification of the results of the control of drinking driving, and investigation report (related to the investigation of victims of damaged objects by a suspect);

1. Previouss before ruling: Criminal references and criminal investigation reports;

arrow