beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Defendant, on January 11, 2014, was working for the Defendant, who is in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, as the field manager directly in charge of the field.
E In the construction site, the victim F, who is the director at the construction site, “on the face of the payment of wages of KRW 50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00
“.....”
However, the Defendant did not use the money borrowed from the victimized party for the purpose of paying wages, but did not use it to G, and there was no deposit or real estate property at the time and no installment savings plan was planned, and there was only KRW 36 million of debt, and thus there was no intention or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed the money from the victimized party.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was delivered KRW 50 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number H) in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.
[1] On December 1, 2016, at around 23:45, the Defendant was found to have driven a coo vehicle in I while under the influence of alcohol in approximately 300 meters from the front of the 21st office in the 21st office of the Yancheon-gun, the Yancheon-gun, the Yancheon-gun, the 201st office of the 20th office of the Yancheon-do to the front of the 20th office of the Yancheon-do.
Defendant 1 driven under the influence of alcohol at the place of detection in front of the above Rocheon Police Station, and at the place of detection in front of the above Rocheon Police Station, he was driven by a police officer K belonging to the JJ District of the Rocheon Police Station, by putting red light on face and making drinking
There are reasonable grounds to recognize the same day, which was demanded from 23:50 to 00:18 the following day to respond to the measurement of drinking alcohol by inserting the whole in 28 minutes between 28 minutes.
Despite this, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, failed to comply with a police officer’s request for a measurement of drinking alcohol.
Summary of Evidence
【2015 order 135】
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. The defendant;