Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four years and by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Gohap 612]

1. Defendants’ crime

A. When the Defendants came to know of the fact that D, who was known to the general public, was in the aftermath of sexual traffic, with the victim E (13 tax, female) who was a juvenile from home, the Defendants conspired to engage in sexual traffic by taking over the victim who was sexually in D, and committing sexual traffic.

On August 8, 2013, the Defendants: (a) taken advantage of the situation in which the victim, who was a juvenile from a social welfare organization “G” located in the Busan Northern District F, did not live in cash, etc. before the public toilet; (b) took advantage of the situation in which there is no place to go, the Defendants told that the victim “(s) was boomed in Kim Sea, boom, and so on; and (c) enticed the victim to the H restaurant located in Kimhae-si.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to attract the victim for the purpose of sexual traffic.

B. The Defendants in violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranginging Sexual Traffic (in the event of coercion, etc. of sexual traffic), on August 2013, 201, called “the victim, who is a juvenile, to be a juvenile,” but the victim refused to do so, the Defendant A said that “if he/she does not refuse to report once, he/she shall not be allowed to do so,” and the Defendant B said that “the juvenile is fine.”

D) Defendant B, who had access to the mobile phone flass “I,” forced me to engage in continuous sexual traffic, and did not comply with this, had the victim receive 120,000 won as the cost of sexual traffic, and had the victim get the same for the vehicle where there was a man on the name of the victim, but refused sexual intercourse on the ground that there was a male on the name of the victim.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit the act of selling sex to juveniles by force, but attempted to commit it.

2. Defendant A’s crime;

A. The Defendant in violation of the Act on the Protection of Children’s Juveniles from Sexual Abuse (similar act) is a “act of similarity”)” in the Jindo located in the Seocho-Nam Kim, Gyeong-nam, 2013.