logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.09.20 2017고단1408
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for three years, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant is a person operating an apartment sales agent (ju) E in Busan Metropolitan Transportation-Ftel, and despite the fact that the “F apartment in Busan Metropolitan Government” had already been sold in lots, the Defendant was willing to acquire the sale deposit, etc. from many unspecified victims by holding the portion of the above apartment and pretending to sell it at a discount. On December 1, 2016, the Defendant reported the apartment sales advertisement at the above company office, and the victim G, who was found to have reported the apartment sales advertisement, has the F apartment portion as a priority bidder for the construction of SK.

At present, the apartment sales premium was at least 60 million won, but it was suggested to the purport that the apartment sales premium would particularly be sold at a discount of 10% compared to the original sales price.

However, (State) EE did not have any intention or ability to sell the above apartment to the victim from the beginning, such as (State) it is not a priority negotiation object for the construction of SK, and did not hold the portion of the above apartment, and the down payment received from the injured party for the business fund, such as operating expenses of the company.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim as above, received 30 million won from the victim as down payment from the victim, that is, from January 23, 2017, from the time to January 23, 2017, he obtained a total of 133 times, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 133 times, and acquired a total of 3 billion won from the victims.

B. No one may request a person engaged in a financial company, etc. to provide transaction information, such as information or data on the details of financial transactions, but the Defendant is willing to acquire financial transaction information, such as the details of loans from the above apartment-related part payments, from the lending consultant B of the Bank, known to the general public. On December 2016, the Defendant is the contractor of the above apartment by telephone to B.

arrow