1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

On June 25, 2013, the National Armed Forces Finance Management Body under the Defendant’s control of Taecheon-gun Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Ticheon-gun Construction”) concluded a contract with Taecheon-gun for the improvement of the runway packings (hereinafter “instant runway construction”) of the Air Force Yancheon-gun, Gyeongcheon-do Office (hereinafter “instant Air Force”) located in Taecheon-do, Gyeongcheon-do (hereinafter “instant Air Force”). From June 25, 2013 to June 24, 2014, for the construction cost of KRW 1,920,198,190,140, and for the construction period from June 25, 2013 to June 24, 2014

(hereinafter “instant contract”). Since then, on June 24, 2014, the said contract was extended the construction period by December 15, 2014, on the ground that “the suspension of construction works to supervise construction works and ensure the quality of construction works” was “the suspension of construction works to ensure the quality of the runway, etc.” on October 10, 2014, on the ground that “the demand for use units and the delay of design change consultation to secure the quality of the runway, etc.” (hereinafter “instant contract”).

On June 27, 2013, the Defendant paid Thai Construction KRW 1,344,00,000 for construction advance payment, KRW 67,459,320 on December 24, 2013, and KRW 285,00,00 on April 24, 2014, respectively.

After the instant construction work due to the rupture of the runway, the runway was closed as the rupture and the rupture of the runway installed in the instant air unit were generated, and it was impossible to take off and land the air craft.

On May 8, 2014, the article reported to the media that the instant runway was constructed in excess of the permissible temperature limit of the design map, and that there was a possibility that the rupture and the rupture would occur due to the error that the instant runway was constructed in excess of the permissible range of the design map.

The Plaintiff, on May 16, 2014, with respect to the part of the runway construction and the HSMC construction (hereinafter “instant subcontracted construction”) among the runway construction, determined as the construction amounting to 456,50,000 won and the construction period from May 16, 2014 to June 15, 2014.