The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentence (one year of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) is deemed to be too unhued and unfair.

2. In light of the following: (a) there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the lower court’s determination; and (b) there are various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and pleadings, the lower court’s punishment seems unfair. Therefore, the Prosecutor’s aforementioned assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below (Article 347 (1) of the relevant law on the criminal facts of 4th page 9 through 11 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Article 232 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 232 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234, 232 of the Criminal Act, and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 232 of the Criminal Act regarding the criminal facts of 1th, Article 232 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 234 and 232 of the Criminal Act, and Article 232 (Preparation of Private Document for Qualification) of the Criminal Act.

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Since it is obvious that it is a clerical error in the “selective choice of each sentence of imprisonment,” it is corrected that it was written ex officio in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure.