beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant, a person running an entertainment drinking house under the trade name of Changwon-si D main shop in Changwon-si, did not allow, arrange, or provide obscene acts. However, up to June 1, 201, the Defendant violated the rules of practice by allowing, arranging, or providing, women E and one other, who found female employees to be engaged in entertainment in the room No. 6 room in order to allow female employees to enjoy entertainment in the room, thereby having them enjoy entertainment in the room no more than 02:40.
2. Determination
A. The following facts are acknowledged according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court.
① From around 01:00 on June 21, 201, the Defendant’s room Nos. 6 of the Djuk points operated by the Defendant, he/she taken a photograph of the G in which E and F, a customer, drinked with G and H, and while playing alcohol, he/she taken a cell phone camera of the E in his/her cell phone.
② On the other hand, at around 01:28 on the same day, the owner of the I shop located in the vicinity of the said D shop reported 112, and the police officer called up, but did not control the police officer, and the head of the I shop called up a person who was aware of the two military units in the I shop in order to kill Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese." The owner of the I shop located in the vicinity of the said D shop. On the other hand, at around 01:28 of the same day, the police officer conducted the control of the instant case with the D station Doese Doese Doese.
(3) G and H consistently state in an investigative agency and this court that they continued to have been forced to go off the clothes of G, and that they stated that they were not forced to go off the clothes of G, and that they continued to go off the clothes of their Doz.
④ The Defendant asserted that G was frightly playing, and G was also the Defendant’s defect that the Defendant was frighten.